To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
This is quite interesting. I think that most people, outside of academe, have stopped listening to “expert” reviewers. If you like Zombie Apocalypse movies and the New York Times reviewer thinks that they are a waste of time, then you will no doubt be more interested in what other people who like zombie movies think. With social media and other sites where anyone can post, we are no longer hostage to the whims and tastes of a few media outlets in New York. A zombie movie on Amazon Prime Video with mostly positive reviews is one that the zombie enthusiast will probably enjoy. This doesn’t apply to academic monographs, of course, where subject experts are still the arbiters of what constitutes good work…